Senior Cloud / DevOps & Platform Engineer · Netherlands

Gary Climacosa

Reliable cloud platforms.
Better engineering workflows.

I help teams modernize cloud infrastructure, automate delivery, and make operational systems easier to run.

Enterprise experience across Azure, Kubernetes and automation. Independent portfolio projects explore developer platforms, observability and human-governed AI, with evidence and limitations visible.

Azure · AWS · Kubernetes · Terraform · Ansible · Governed AI

20+ years
Cloud & infrastructure
Azure · AKS
Platform engineering
Terraform · Ansible
Infrastructure automation
Governed AI
Current portfolio focus

Enterprise employment and independent portfolio work are labeled separately throughout.

Explore the connected portfolio direction →

What I Build

Cloud platforms, Kubernetes, and delivery systems shaped around clear ownership and day-two operations.

For AI workflows, I focus on evidence, explicit workflow state, and human decisions.

Cloud Platform Engineering

I design and deliver cloud foundations with infrastructure as code, repeatable releases, and operational ownership in view. The goal is a platform teams can understand, change, and support after handover.

"Automation should reduce risk, not add mystery."

Kubernetes & Distributed Systems

My platform work spans Kubernetes and Azure AKS, alongside self-hosted environments used for portfolio builds. I focus on how deployments, data, monitoring, and team responsibilities fit together once services are running.

"Use distributed systems deliberately."

DevSecOps & Release Engineering

I connect infrastructure automation and CI/CD with release coordination, validation, and rollback planning. A useful delivery path makes changes repeatable while keeping the evidence and recovery steps clear to the people operating the service.

"A release is ready when its recovery path is clear."

Cloud Migration & API Platforms

My experience includes migration work from Leaseweb into Azure AKS and platform operations supporting around 36 APIs. I keep service dependencies, traffic, ownership, and transition risk visible throughout the change.

"Plan the service transition, not just the destination."

FinOps & Cost Engineering

My FinOps case study compares modeled AWS deployment options, including cost and operational trade-offs. The estimates help make assumptions visible; they are not measured production savings.

"Make cost drivers visible before choosing the design."

Governed AI Workflows

HARP and OpenRAG explore cited evidence, private retrieval, and read-only tool access with human approval. LangGraph already coordinates the synthetic, fixed-pattern Workbench PoC; I am studying broader stateful workflow patterns. I am also studying model and tool integration with LangChain and LLM tracing and evaluation with Langfuse.

"Keep evidence visible and decisions with people."

Location
North-Brabant, Netherlands
Core Tech
AWS · Azure · Kubernetes · Terraform · Python
Focus
Cloud platforms · FinOps · Distributed systems · AI systems
Open To
Senior engineering roles · Architecture-heavy delivery work

From developer workspace to reliable operations — proposed integration

Proposed integration · components have different maturity levels

Developer setup can be inconsistent, releases hard to trace, and troubleshooting context scattered. These portfolio projects explore how repeatable environments, delivery controls and evidence-led investigation could fit together.

  1. 01

    Create

    One-user pilot

    Repeatable Coder workspaces with selected checks recorded. Recovery and multi-user qualification remain open.

  2. 02

    Deliver

    Integration proposed

    Connect delivery controls, infrastructure as code and release evidence. The cross-project handoff is not implemented.

  3. 03

    Observe

    Partial implementation

    One workload's logs and separate infrastructure metrics. Broader coverage and application tracing remain unproven.

  4. 04

    Investigate safely

    Read-only prototype

    HARP brings cited context to a person. People retain decisions and execution; no autonomous remediation.

Demonstrated separately

Selected workspace workflows, a scoped log pipeline and read-only incident evidence. Each project page records its own scope and limits.

Still to validate

End-to-end integration, recovery, multi-user isolation and shared security gates. This is a connected architecture direction, not one production deployment.

Projects, Prototypes & Case Studies

A selection of case studies, prototypes, architectures, and applications. Labels distinguish project type from its current maturity.

Developer platform Pilot

Developer Environment Platform

Make engineering workspaces easier to reproduce.

Evidence & scope

One-user Coder pilot with recorded workflow and basic file-retention checks. Recovery, multi-user isolation and a separate app/QA lifecycle remain unqualified.

Technical details and recorded evidence

Challenge: Different engineering tasks need repeatable tools and clear data ownership. Stopping workspace compute should preserve project files, while temporary app/test environments need an independent cleanup lifecycle.

Approach: Extended the existing Coder Community deployment with seven versioned use-case templates on Kubernetes and bundled synthetic projects. Recorded live notebook, tooling, pipeline, telemetry and offline task-boundary checks, including basic file retention across stop/start. AI Service Development and QA Automation have published builds and offline checks while their live evidence is reconciled. The separate app/test service remains proposed.

Recorded outcome: Seven use-case templates published for a one-user Coder pilot. Live workflows and one basic stop/start check are recorded for five; recovery and multi-user qualification remain open.

My role: Platform design and pilot operations

Partial homelab implementation Partial implementation

Homelab Observability with Planned Cloud PoC

Make failures easier to investigate.

Evidence & scope

Recorded logs from one selected Kubernetes workload, with separate metrics and endpoint checks. Single-instance Loki; tracing remains unproven.

Technical details and recorded evidence

Challenge: Add useful workload logs without replacing existing monitoring or implying fleet-wide coverage.

Approach: Recorded real stdout/stderr from one namespace- and label-selected Kubernetes demo workload through Kubernetes Grafana Alloy, a TLS/Basic Auth Caddy push gateway, dedicated 24-hour Loki, and authenticated Grafana. A separate backend Alloy file canary has exercised the log path; periodic freshness is not established. Existing infrastructure Prometheus/Grafana remains separate, and the log viewer has only a Loki datasource. Selected NAS management and hosted-service endpoints now have TCP reachability checks through the existing metrics stack; these measure connection availability, not storage or application health. The UI uses a separate Caddy proxy and supervised restricted SSH forward; its browser-to-Caddy LAN hop is unencrypted HTTP.

Recorded outcome: Recorded partial deployment for one workload. Loki is single-instance with 24-hour retention and no HA; this is not comprehensive monitoring. AWS is a planned, unprovisioned PoC; Azure is reference-only; application tracing remains future work. Core pipeline records reviewed 20 October 2026; NAS endpoint checks and coverage reviewed 21 October 2026. These are dated observations, not a continuous uptime claim.

My role: Architecture, integration, and staged delivery

Reliability case study Read-only prototype

HARP Reliability Platform

Bring incident evidence together while people retain control.

Evidence & scope

Read-only tools and retrieval assemble cited context. A reliability prototype; no autonomous remediation or new correctness claim.

Technical details and recorded evidence

Challenge: When alerts fire, operational knowledge is scattered across runbooks, RCAs, dashboards, and chat history. AI-assisted triage without citations drifts into weakly grounded recommendations.

Approach: Built HARP to turn alerts and Git-tracked operational knowledge into cited evidence packs. AI clients receive read-only context through MCP, while workflow state and remediation approval remain under human control. Under the hood: BM25 + hybrid search, optional OpenRAG semantic retrieval, synthetic monitoring signal paths, and Nero-Camp for approval state.

Recorded outcome: A homelab prototype that assembles cited evidence through read-only MCP, with deterministic BM25 fallback and human approval retained for remediation.

My role: Architecture, build, integration, and reliability design

Recorded project reference: MCP 0.5.0

Virtual desktop platform Single-user pilot

Virtual Desktop Platform

Give a single engineer a private, repeatable desktop.

Evidence & scope

Ubuntu desktop pilot with owner-reported use and an isolated base-VM restore. Final desktop recovery and session resilience remain open.

Technical details and recorded evidence

Challenge: Engineering desktops need a private access path and a recovery method that can be tested without disrupting other workloads.

Approach: Cloned an existing Ubuntu cloud-init template, configured XFCE and xrdp, and restricted desktop access to Tailscale. Rehearsed base-VM backup and an isolated restore using synthetic data.

Recorded outcome: Proxmox pilot built, private RDP reachability verified, and single-user use reported by the owner. An isolated base-VM restore passed; session resilience and independent file-version recovery remain open.

My role: Platform design, pilot build, access configuration and recovery testing

Incident triage Prototype

EKS Triage Copilot

Structure scattered Kubernetes incident context.

Evidence & scope

Python/FastAPI triage prototype. AWS deployment and EKS integration remain planned; the demo is not evidence of those integrations.

Technical details and recorded evidence

Challenge: Kubernetes incidents often start with scattered context across logs, alerts, and cluster state, which slows down first-pass diagnosis.

Approach: Built a containerized Python/FastAPI workflow to structure incident context for Kubernetes triage. AWS Bedrock, Lambda, API Gateway, and EKS describe a proposed deployment path, not a production service.

Recorded outcome: A containerized prototype workflow that turns incident context into a first-pass summary; no EKS integration has been validated, and AWS deployment remains planned.

My role: Prototype design and implementation

Knowledge platform Prototype

OpenRAG Knowledge Platform

Find useful answers across a private document collection.

Evidence & scope

A self-hosted retrieval prototype for search, reranking and cited answers. Current service health has not been requalified for this presentation.

Technical details and recorded evidence

Challenge: Teams want AI-assisted document search without pushing sensitive material into a broad public SaaS workflow.

Approach: Set up a private RAG stack with vector search, reranking, and cited answers on self-hosted infrastructure, while using cloud LLM services selectively.

Recorded outcome: A private retrieval environment for testing vector search, reranking, cited answers, and self-hosted operations.

My role: Deployment, integration, and system design

Infrastructure architecture Documented architecture

Homelab Architecture

Give portfolio experiments a real operating environment.

Evidence & scope

Documented self-hosted infrastructure for Kubernetes and data services, with network boundaries and delivery trade-offs.

Technical details and recorded evidence

Challenge: Portfolio systems are hard to evaluate if they only exist as diagrams or code snippets.

Approach: Built a small self-hosted platform with Proxmox, Kubernetes, storage, and internal tooling so projects can be deployed and operated end to end.

Recorded outcome: A documented substrate for Kubernetes and data services, with explicit network boundaries and GitOps delivery.

My role: Design and operations

FinOps case study Modeled

AWS Cost Dashboard

Compare operating cost before choosing a cloud design.

Evidence & scope

Historical modeled comparison: approximately $27 to $6 per month. Estimates demonstrate trade-offs; they are not realized customer savings.

Technical details and recorded evidence

Challenge: Engineering teams need actionable spend insights, not raw billing data — and the infrastructure itself should demonstrate cost awareness.

Approach: Modeled V1 with ECS Fargate + ALB at about $27/month and V2 with EC2 t4g.nano + Caddy at about $6/month. The estimates represent about 78% lower modeled infrastructure cost; both options use the same Lambda + Athena pipeline and GitLab CI lifecycle assumptions.

Recorded outcome: Two modeled deployment designs make the cost and operational trade-offs explicit; savings are estimates, not measured production spend.

My role: FinOps engineer

Recorded project reference: ~78% · ~$27 → ~$6/month

Language-learning app Built application

Climacs Taal

Make Dutch pronunciation consistent across devices.

Evidence & scope

A reading-first app with pre-generated audio and accessible playback. Ordinary playback has no runtime cloud dependency.

Technical details and recorded evidence

Challenge: Browser and operating-system speech voices vary, making pronunciation inconsistent for language learners.

Approach: Built a static-first learning SPA with reviewed lesson data, deterministic audio manifests, Amazon Polly generation, normal/slow MP3s, client-side progress, and accessible playback controls.

Recorded outcome: A static-first Dutch practice app with pre-generated audio; ordinary playback has no runtime cloud dependency.

My role: Product design, architecture, integration, and release engineering

Recorded project reference: Vite · Laura Neural nl-NL · 406 scoped MP3s

Platform workflow prototype Synthetic PoC

Cloud Platform Workbench

Keep constraints and human review visible before a build.

Evidence & scope

Synthetic workflow creates a versioned planning pack after review. It does not provision infrastructure.

Technical details and recorded evidence

Challenge: Infrastructure requests can move too quickly from a short brief to an assumed design. Constraints, unresolved questions, and the human decision need to stay visible before anyone treats a plan as ready to build.

Approach: Built a LangGraph workflow around two fixed synthetic homelab patterns: a VM with containers and a single-server K3s design. Deterministic rules validate the request, stale reviews clear when inputs change, and approval generates a five-file pack with a manifest. SQLite stores the business decision record separately from workflow checkpoints.

Recorded outcome: The workbench documents a plan for two fixed synthetic patterns and does not provision infrastructure.

My role: Workflow design, implementation, and integration

Selected Experience

Selected employment roles and assignments across cloud, platform, infrastructure, and engineering validation.

Dec 2025 – Present

Self-employed / ZZP — Independent Engineering Projects

Cloud, DevOps & Applied AI Platform Engineering

  • Building and documenting portfolio systems across cloud platforms, Kubernetes, hybrid infrastructure, and governed AI workflows
  • Project pages state what is built, modeled, planned, or still unqualified
Dec 2024 – Nov 2025

TOPdesk Nederland BV

Cloud Engineer — Platform & AKS

  • Platform support across cloud and SaaS environments with structured change and release coordination
  • Operational improvement, deployment validation, incident management, and post-release review
Jan 2024 – Nov 2024

Luxoft / DXC Technology

DevOps Engineer

Client assignment: ASML, Veldhoven, Netherlands — Engineering QA & Test Automation

  • Performed engineering QA, functional testing, regression checks and release validation.
  • Proactively developed scripts to reduce repetitive manual testing and improve consistency.
  • Used Polarion ALM for requirements, test evidence and defect traceability.
Earlier experience

DXC Technology / HPE

Infrastructure & Automation

  • Infrastructure delivery, cloud migration, and structured deployment planning across multiple clients
  • Operational readiness, go-live support, and large-scale modernization

The portfolio projects on this site are how I make newer areas visible: by building, documenting, and testing them in public rather than claiming expertise I have not earned yet.

What I'm Currently Exploring

The questions and tools I am studying next across hybrid platforms, governed workflows, and AI observability.

Edge computing

How smaller distributed deployments change operational design, observability, and failure handling when you cannot assume a single central environment.

Hybrid cloud

Patterns that split work between cloud services and self-hosted components without losing track of ownership, deployment flow, or support boundaries.

Proactive AI Reliability (HARP)

Exploring how synthetic monitoring, cited retrieval, and human approval can support earlier incident investigation through HARP, OpenRAG, and Nero-Camp.

LangChain · models and tools

Studying how model and tool integrations can support small, understandable AI workflows, with clear retrieval boundaries and evidence behind the output.

LangGraph · workflow state

Exploring explicit state, checkpoints, failure paths, and human approval in agent workflows, including how a paused run can be inspected and resumed.

Langfuse · AI observability

Exploring traces of model calls, retrieval, and tools, together with latency, usage, and evaluations that help explain how an AI workflow behaves.

Practical Engineering,
Clear Tradeoffs

I'm Gary Climacosa. My background is in enterprise infrastructure, automation, SaaS operations, and cloud delivery, with hands-on experience across AWS, Azure, and Kubernetes environments.

More recently, I've been using portfolio work to explore AI systems and hybrid architectures in a practical way: by deploying real components, documenting the tradeoffs, and keeping the infrastructure visible.

I don't present myself as a deep edge specialist yet. It's an area I'm actively exploring, especially where edge, hybrid cloud, and AI systems meet and where data boundaries shape the design.

What matters to me is building systems that can be explained clearly: where data lives, what is automated, what it costs to run, and how another engineer would support it later.

FinOps Foundation member since 2025

Embedded with your team

I integrate directly with engineering teams — not as an outsider delivering a report, but as a contributor shipping alongside your people.

Pairs with developers & SREs

Infrastructure decisions are better when the people operating them are part of the conversation. I pair, review, and teach.

Simple, auditable, automated

Every system I build can be understood by the next engineer. No hidden complexity, no heroic runbooks.

Let's Connect

Based in the Netherlands and seeking long-term salaried Cloud, DevOps and Platform Engineering roles, especially hands-on work across AWS, Azure, Kubernetes, hybrid cloud, or practical AI systems.

I require employer sponsorship under the Dutch Highly Skilled Migrant (kennismigrant) route.

I aim to respond within one business day.